JESUS CONFRONTS THE PURITY CODES
SIXTH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME – YEAR B
St. Thomas Independent Catholic Church
St. Thomas Independent Catholic Church
Rev. Dcn. David Justin Lynch
Leviticus 13:1-2;44-46 Psalm
32:1-2,5,11
I Corinthians 10:31-11:1 Mark 1:40-45
I Corinthians 10:31-11:1 Mark 1:40-45
+ In the name of the
Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, AMEN.
Humans are social beings. That undisputed fact really comes home to us
when we are sick. We look to other people to comfort and take care of
us. Even terminal illnesses, which remind us that we might die, elicit comfort
and support. When it comes to afflictions like cancer, friends and family rally
to form networks to care for us. But among some so-called Christians,
there seems to be one exception: AIDS, which is an acronym for “acquired immune
deficiency syndrome.” Their
response seems to be to blame the victim, particularly if the victim was gay. Their
underlying assumption is that somehow, sexual orientation was a choice that God
should punish. Modern science, however, has proven otherwise…one’s sexual
orientation is genetic, not a choice. The so-called Christians
victimizing AIDS victims have it wrong on another front as well: straight
people can contract and pass AIDS; anyone can get it through
intravenous drug use, as well as through blood transfusions. It can also be
transmitted by a mother to a child in her womb. Yet, despite these facts, some
of those so-called Christians think AIDS is punishment for sins, particularly
so-called sexual sins.
These attitudes towards AIDS are similar
to the way the people of the Old Testament treated lepers. Leprosy, also known
as Hansen’s Disease, is no longer the problem it was in biblical times. Modern medicine can and does cure the very
rare cases that pop up now and then. But
the way the ancient peoples treated lepers was similar to the way some
so-called Christians treat AIDS victims. Like the way the lepers were treated,
they isolated and stigmatized them. Lepers, like the AIDS patients about ten to
twenty years ago, were left to suffer the deterioration of their bodies alone,
ostracized by strangers, friends, and even their families. These patients often
experience psycho-social suffering that equals, and sometimes surpasses, their
physical pain.
What’s at work here are the “Purity Codes”
that are laid out in some detail in the Book of Leviticus, Chapters 11 through 15, in particular,
Chapter 13, that deals with skin diseases. Leviticus originated from what’s
known as the “P Source” or “Priestly Source,” one of four sources of the first
five books of the Bible, called the Pentateuch.
The traditional view is that Leviticus goes back to the time of Moses, but
most scholars now think that Leviticus developed much later, either
around the time of the deportation to Babylon in the sixth or fifth centuries
before Christ, or perhaps as late as after the return from exile, a few decades
later.
The Purity Codes were intended to be a model for the
relationship between the so-called chosen people and their God. The Old Testament priests thought their place
of worship became holy by the presence of the Lord and kept apart from
uncleanliness, so, purportedly, God will dwell among the people of Israel when
Israel is purified, that is, made holy, and therefore separated from other
peoples in the area. You see, for many centuries, the people of Israel did not
have exclusive use of their territory – they were constantly fighting off pagan
tribes like the Canaanites, the Amorites, the Jebusites, and the Gergashites
who worshipped strange Gods, and in some cases, offered human sacrifices. The Purity
Code in Leviticus was, for the people of Israel, an important way to distinguish
themselves from these other groups and their disgraceful practices. In the mind of the Levitical priesthood,
observance of the Purity Codes was necessary to be able to approach God and be part
to the Jewish community. So it’s not hard to believe that the entire society
was structured around the Purity Codes. A purity system is a cultural map that
puts everything in its place. The concept of purity in Leviticus was intended
to reduce the fear of unknown or hostile unclean powers to a legal concept,
that is, the Levites thought that uncleanness is hateful to God, and must be
avoided by all who have to do with God. Obviously, that concept is not very
scientific, but even today, so-called Christians, out of ignorance, ascribe
AIDS to sin, just as some of the rabbis thought the same thing about leprosy.
The Jewish equivalent of bible commentaries is called a
“midrash,” and a particular one that deals with chapter thirteen of Leviticus
is called “Negaim”. It taught that leprosy was the result of ten different
kinds of sins, including idol-worship, unchastity, bloodshed, the profanation
of the Divine Name, blasphemy, robbing the public, usurping a dignity to which
one has no right, overweening pride, evil speech, and an evil eye. The
Negaim goes on to cite various parts of the Toráh to back up these assertions,
just as some Christians go through the bible and do proof-texting to develop
so-called evidence to support their opinions.
Despite science, leprosy and AIDS are among the few
diseases where society holds the afflicted personally, and pejoratively,
culpable for their suffering. These harsh judgments show a certain smug
attitude that says, "they got what they deserve". That kind of
thinking defies common sense and Christian charity. In the face of
modern science, Purity Codes are irrational, but some so-called Christians
still apparently have a need for them to marginalize and scapegoat those they
consider impure, such as what the right-wingers do to the LGBT community.
Today’s gospel tells us that Jesus,
however, had a different approach. By way of analogy, Jesus touching the leper
was like Yahweh stretching out his hand to part the waters to free his people
in the crossing
of the Red
Sea, as described
in various passages
of Exodus, but that would not
be the whole story. It is much more concrete, much more human than that. Here
in today’s Gospel, the leper approached Jesus in a meek and humble way, wanting
more than anything else to be made clean. Jesus, despite the prevailing Purity
Codes, touched the supposedly unclean man. Thus, Jesus paid no attention
to the abstract concept of exclusion; he dealt with it as a concrete reality,
here and now, in the flesh. As was the case throughout His ministry, Jesus
doesn’t think much of the Purity Codes. Jesus openly challenged those Purity
Codes on more than one occasion, not only with words, but with actions. Jesus
instituted a new form of behavior by openly disregarding the Purity
Codes many times when He healed people. For Jesus, the Purity Codes were simply
not part of the new aeon that began with His Incarnation. Purity Codes were
something to be left behind, left out of the new age that was to characterize
the coming of the Kingdom of God. Hence, Jesus directly challenged the Purity
Codes by open defiance. He shared his meals with tax collectors, prostitutes,
and other sinners. His open table policy presented the vision of an inclusive
community, that numbered among its members many outside the boundaries of the
purity system, including women, untouchables, the poor, the maimed, and the
marginalized,
Jesus didn’t buy into the dualistic view of wholeness, that
what is pure is holy, while what is impure was dangerous and/or evil. Jesus, instead,
looked at the leper as a person, not just a leper, and honored his
dignity as a person instead of shunning him, as was the prevailing custom. In the legal world, we lawyers have a set of
sayings called “maxims of equity.” One of those is, “when the reason for the
rule has been abolished, so should the rule.” Jesus recognized that principle
throughout many aspects of His ministry, particularly when it came to ministering
to people. Today’s Gospel says that when Jesus touched and healed the leper, He
was “moved with pity”, illustrating that for Jesus, the humanity of the person
to whom he was ministering was of far greater importance than obeying any
rule. For Jesus, the reason for the Purity Codes vanished, because He saw that in
any conflict between what rules require, and what human compassion mandates,
human compassion wins. Jesus was not a rules-based person, and Christianity is
not a rules-based religion. It is a religion based on God’s acceptance of us as
is, where is, with all faults. By healing the leper, Jesus is telling us that
rules based religion is not part of the Kingdom of God.
The effect of the purity system was to create a world with sharp
social boundaries, between virtuous people and sinners, male and female, rich and
poor, Jew and Gentile. What Jesus did was to remove the dividing lines that the
purity laws represent, and which separate those who participate in God’s
community, and those who stand outside. With Jesus, however, there are no
outsiders. There are no outcasts. Jesus includes everyone, without
exception. With Jesus, there is no
longer any boundary between acceptable and unacceptable. Red or yellow, black,
brown or white, we are all acceptable in God’s sight, human laws
notwithstanding. Jesus touched an
untouchable. For Jesus, no one is untouchable. Here, Jesus saw a need
for a change in the status quo. He wanted rules replaced with compassion. That
is because God is compassionate, and Jesus saw compassion as the route to true
holiness. For Jesus, purity was on the
inside of a person, not the outside. The way Jesus reasons, is that what comes
out of us shows what is inside us.
At the time Jesus encountered the leper, leprosy had caused
fear and loathing for centuries. According to the prevailing law and custom set
out in the Book of Leviticus, a leper was required to live outside the
community, ring a bell and cry “unclean.” But here, Jesus was, for this
man, a way to re-enter the community with his family and friends. That is why Jesus
told him to go show himself to a Temple priest, so that others would believe he
had been cleansed and he could once again be among his family and friends. This
man was so thankful and overjoyed that he was made clean, that he disregarded
the instructions from Jesus to not tell anyone about it. Jesus
didn't want the man to spread the news about his miraculous healing
indiscriminately. That was because Jesus realized that people didn't yet have
the full context in which to understand who Jesus was and why He was performing
miracles. Still, the man found it hard to keep the good news private and not to tell others about it. The
result was the story got out about the healing power of Jesus, and made him
highly popular right away. Whatever
might have caused Jesus problems with crowds didn’t last, because
later passages in Mark depict him with large number of people, and without
signs of distress.
The healing ministry of Jesus illustrated
what the Kingdom of God would be like for humanity, that is, a restoration
to a condition of blessedness, where we thrive and flourish, no longer
oppressed by the powers of evil. Today’s Epistle invites us to do everything we
do to the glory of God and to imitate Jesus in the way our society lives, which
doesn’t include enforcing purity codes against other people.
The Greek word “Ekklesia” is often used as a word meaning
“church.” A more accurate translation is not a physical building or a
denomination, but “those who are called.” We, that is, all of us, not
just clergy, are the Church. We are a community called to fight against
invidious and irrational segregation of all kinds, such as the segregation of
religious, cultural or racial minorities, the economic segregation
of so many
millions of human
beings in the
world who live
below the threshold of poverty, human dignity and subsistence; and the
segregation of the invalids, the handicapped, and the disabled in the
midst of a
society governed by
competition and material
gain. The segregation mindset is
still part of the culture in some places, like Alabama, where governor George
Wallace stood in the schoolhouse door to oppose racial integration and where
today State Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore obstructed the Federal Courts
by telling the probate judges not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex
couples.
As disciples of
Christ following in his footsteps, we, the Church, are called to fight
against all these and all other forms of segregation. Our faith calls us
not to make distinctions between persons when we help them and to serve in
charity. Jesus did not make distinctions between those who approached Him to be
helped, between the good and the bad, rich and poor, nobles or common people,
high priests, soldiers, or lepers. So why should we? Jesus helped them all,
as we all should.
The leper story in the Gospel makes clear the power of God to
touch, to cleanse, to make whole, and to incorporate outcasts into the
community, is not just something we imagine or want. It is, rather, a tangible
power, something we can touch, experienced in each of our lives to overcome the brokenness and suffering from
the unclean powers of today’s world as we move from an ethos driven by Purity
Codes, to one driven by compassion.
The leper cleansing story we heard today makes clear that
the Gospel will always have the power to overcome the boundaries of Purity Codes
that interfere with the spreading of the good news from Jesus,
that the Kingdom of God is at hand, is with us today, and will be forever. AMEN.
Comments