ANIMALS TEACH HUMILITY AND UNCONDITIONAL LOVE
Twenty-Sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time / Feast of Saint
Francis
October 01 2017 10:30 AM
Saint Cecilia Catholic Community
Rev. David Justin Lynch
Ezekiel 18:25-28 Psalm 25:4-9
Philippians 2:1-11 Matthew 21:28-31
+ In the name of
the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, AMEN.
Humility. That’s
a very, very, difficult, extremely difficult, concept for humanity generally,
particularly in the United States of America. Our culture communicates a message
that sounds like this. “Be a winner.” “Be better than the next person.” “Be
First.” That’s called the “achievement ethic”. It supports our meritocracy, that
vertically rates everyone an everything. But all of that is the exact opposite
of humility, not what the life and message of Jesus teaches us.
Today’s Gospel
relates an encounter between Jesus and the high priests and elders of the
Jerusalem temple. They were not unlike today’s church hierarchy. We still have our
share of chief priests and elders. So many clergy define their success in the
church in the same way people define it in the secular world, moving up the
hierarchy to positions of increased importance. I assure you, I am not one of them. I am
delighted to simply be your parish priest, nothing more.
I grew up as a
high-church Episcopalian in Greenwich, Connecticut. My parents sent me to Brunswick,
a private school for boys. That environment communicates lofty expectations to
young people. Get good grades, better than other kids. Be a leader on the
sports field and in extra-curricular activities like student government and various
clubs. Do all that to get yourself into a so-called “good” college. Date other
high achievers who are good looking. Move up in society by build connections
with people who can help you “get ahead”, which, translated, means a nice house
in a so-called “good” neighborhood, driving a “nice” car, and membership in a
country club. That’s what was clearly expected of me when I was a child. But wven when I left private school at my own
insistence, because I wanted to be where the girls were, the public high school
communicated much the same message: work hard to be better than the next person
in everything you do. Survival depends on
competing with other people was the idea.
But all of that, on the inside, was very stressful for me
and disturbed my soul on a very deep level.
So, I purposely did not go to an ivy-league college, as was expected of
me. Instead, I went to colleges that featured ordinary folk as students, often
the first generation in their families to go to college. And I left the East
Coast pressure-cooker altogether in 1976 at the age of twenty-four and
immigrated to California.
Why did the
environment in which I grew up disturb me so much? Because its values were not
the values of Jesus! Jesus was, has
been, and will always, be more important to me than any other person, no matter
how smart, no matter how wealthy, no matter how good-looking. And why is Jesus the ultimate ideal? Is it
because Jesus was fully divine as well as fully human? No. Jesus is the focal
point for me because of the way He is described in today’s Epistle. “Though in
the form of God, did not regard equality with God as something to be grasped.”
“He emptied Himself”. “He took the form of a slave.” “He humbled himself”. “He
became obedient to the point of death.” And for all of this, God highly exalted
Him.
That description
of Jesus represented exactly the opposite of the characteristics of those in
the audience to whom Jesus spoke in today’s Gospel. In the timeline set out in
Matthew’s gospel, the conversation in today’s pericope occurred after Jesus had
just entered Jerusalem after a journey from the north lasting several months. When
He arrived, he no longer engaged in petty disputations with the Pharisees and
scribes of the law at the local synagogue in Nazareth. Jesus was now at the big
show, taking on the chief priests and elders of the Jerusalem Temple, the
ecclesiastical establishment of first-century Judaism known as the Sadducees. Today’s
dialogue occurred after Jesus stormed the Temple and threw out the money
changers. When asked by what authority he did this, He told the Sadducees, “I’m
not going to tell you.” To the Sadducees, Jesus was a serious disrupter of
their status quo. They were not ready
for a Jesus who would tell them the last shall be first and the first shall be
last. They were not ready for the
Magnificat, the Song of Mary, about a God will put down the mighty from their
seat and exalt the humble and meek. Pride, not humility, was their game plan.
The two sons in
today’s gospel contrast pride and humility.
Look at the first son, the one who responds to his father’s request to
go work in the vineyard, “I will not” but then goes anyways. This guy wants to
have it both ways, to satisfy his pride. When he says, “I will not” he
demonstrates pride by defiance. We’ve all been in situations where we’ve
resented someone else telling us to do something we should do, and we rebel by
saying “No.” That’s showing our ego, our independence, our pride. And then he
goes and works in the field anyways. He’s doing that, so he’ll score points in
the eyes of others, for realizing he shouldn’t have said “No”, and then doing
the so-called right thing in going to work as he should have. Instinctively,
the priests and elders of the Jerusalem temple, liked this guy better, and so
do most of us, at first glance. He looks like a hero. The second son, however,
is the opposite. He says “Yes, I’ll go,” but then doesn’t go. Our instinct is
to condemn his dishonesty. We don’t like his kind of moral character, promising
to do something and then not doing it. This fellow, however, is without the rebellious
pride of the first son. He says he’ll go to work. And he exhibits no pride at all when he didn’t
go to work. He was, therefore, not able to boast that he’s changed his ways
like the first guy did. His lack of rebellious pride is why Jesus says that
second guy is doing is father’s will, even though he lied to his Father. To
Jesus, it was better to be dishonest than rebellious.
When Jesus asked
the chief priests and elders which of the two sons did the will of their
father, they did not think like God thinks. They thought in terms of common
sense human values: the first guy recognized his mistake and turned around,
while the second son was a despicable liar. He was a sinner. But again, God’s
choices, what God thinks is good or bad, is way different from how we look at
life. The kind of people we think are
good are not always the kind of people God thinks are good. Why is God like that? Jesus tells us it is the
sick who need a physician, not those who are healthy. In God’s eyes, the more
one sins, the more opportunity there is for mercy, and mercy is what God is all
about.
What Jesus is telling us today is that God looks for, and
cares for, sinners, like tax collectors and prostitutes, and even people who
lie. To give you some context, in first century Palestine, Jews who collected
taxes for the Roman empire. They were seen as turncoats, traitors to their own
countrymen who helped, rather than fought, the Roman oppressors. Prostitutes were associated with the idolatry
of the polytheistic pagan worship that flew in the face of monotheism. But in
the scheme of the Kingdom of Heaven, tax collecting and prostitution are very minor
transgressions. The Gospel tells us that the preaching of John the Baptist convinced
them to change their ways, but the chief priests and the elders did not. Their evaluation of the parable Jesus told
them illustrates precisely that. They evaluated the situation in by their
unchanged worldly values, not God’s values. Their thinking represented the Old
Covenant, mirrored in today’s first reading.
To them, the first son was the one who turned away from iniquity and did
what was right and just, and should therefore be rewarded, while the second son
was the one who did the opposite: he turned away from virtue and committed
iniquity by lying about going to work in his father’s vineyard. But Jesus said the
second son was the one who did his father’s will. Why? Because that son said,
“Yes,” not “No.” God wants people who say, “Yes,” even if we don’t follow
through on doing what we say we will do. The person who says “No” is a rebel. The person who says
“Yes” is humble. The person who says “Yes”, even if imperfect, is open to
redemption, open to change, at God’s behest and direction, while the person who
says “No” is not, even if that person later does an about-face, because pride
is motivating the “about face.” To put
this all in very blunt terms, God doesn’t like big egos, people who boast,
gloat, and brag about turning from sin. Those kinds of feelings are what makes
someone seek and acquires domination over other people and commits acts of
oppression and exploitation to feed the beast that lives inside them. That
beast is pride.
And that brings
us to animals. In the tradition of the church, we are taught to follow the
examples of the saints, those who have lived holy lives, in many cases, dying
for their faith. But the markers of God’s kingdom for guidance in our lives are
not found exclusively in human persons. The way animals are, and the way they
live, have a message for us, too. This week on Wednesday, October fourth, is the Feast of St.
Francis. He has an interesting life story. He was born into a wealthy family, but
gave away most of his money and deliberately impoverished himself to empathize with
the poor. He was never a bishop. He was never a priest. He was an ordained deacon.
The word “deacon” comes from the Greek word, “diakonos”, which means, “servant.”
The Diaconate fit Francis perfectly. He was, before anything else, a humble servant
of God.
Francis is widely known for his relationship to animals. He
urged as to care for them. He preached to birds. He tamed wolves. Animals were
his brothers and sisters. The many stories about Francis and animals exhibit a
common theme. The interactions between Francis and the animals all demonstrate
that animals have no ego, no pride as we know it. Animals don’t exploit,
enslave, or oppress other animals. That is unique to humans. What Christians
call grace is present in our relations with animals, just as it is with other
humans. Grace is the inclusive and expansive power of God's love to create and
sustain relationships of mutuality and reciprocity.
Sheep set important examples for us. Sheep are
social flock animals. Sheep have a tendency to congregate close to other
members of a flock. Sheep can become stressed when separated from their flock
members. Relationships in flocks tend to be closest among related sheep: a ewe, that is a female sheep, and her direct
descendants, often move as a unit within large flocks. Sheep are a lot like us.
They like being with other sheep, and especially with their blood-related
family members. We find sheep and shepherd imagery throughout the Bible in both
Old and New Testaments. The tradition of the church speaks of pastors as
shepherds of their flocks. But humans differ from sheep in a significant way: sheep
are humble. They don’t know anything about pride. They are content just to be
the sheep that God made them. They don’t, and in fact can’t, try to be a better
sheep so other sheep, or their shepherd, or God, will love them more. We humans
are not always like that.
Another animal
that sets a good example for people by way of humility is a dog. Like sheep,
and like us, they are social animals. Dogs seek and provide companionship and
affection. Dogs give and want love. Dogs say yes to you. Dogs want to please
you. Dogs desire, above all, to be with you. And as with sheep, dogs have no
pride, no ego. Dogs are humble. The way dogs relate to us sets a good example of
how we should relate to God. The very word “dog” has “god” in it: just spell it
backwards. So let’s turn things around.
Just as we feed and care for our dogs, God feeds and cares for us. God provides us companionship and affection.
God gives and wants love. We were made to please God. We were made to say yes
to God. For all of that to happen, we need to be relate to God like dogs relate
to us. Like dogs, we need to be without ego
and pride. We don’t do God’s will when we act like the first son in today’s
Gospel, defiantly saying “No” to God and then try to score points by turning
our lives around. We do God’s will when we say “Yes”, even if we don’t follow
through. Why? God expects us to be imperfect, and the more imperfect we are,
the more God loves us.
The things un-humble
people chase with so much passion,
social status, monetary success, and the symbols thereof, lead to pursuing power
over others for the purpose of oppressing, subjugating, and exploiting the
world around us. It is also very stressful. Look at how many hard-driving,
success-oriented, power-seeking people suffer heart attacks, strokes, diabetes,
and other health problems. Those things are God’s messages to us that those
things are no good. But because all that striving for success leads to nefarious
purposes and outcomes, our material success in this life and our status in
relation to other people, are not important to God.
What God values is love, unconditional love, like the love
we get from dogs. Got created dogs, and I am sure other animal companions as
well, to show us what God’s love for us looks like: unconditional. We can only
experience that unconditional love to and from God, and to and from other
people, when we empty ourselves, humble ourselves, and say “Yes” to God. Don’t try to exalt yourself through your own
efforts. Save yourself all that stress. Instead, be humble, and God will exalt
you. AMEN.
Comments