GENEROSITY AND TRUST IN GOD
THIRTY SECOND SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME – YEAR
B
November 08, 2015
Saint Cecilia Catholic Community
Rev. Dcn. David Justin Lynch
1 Kings 17:10-16 Psalm 146:7-10
Hebrews 9:24-28 Mark 12:38-44
+ In the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
AMEN.
Today’s readings are about
generosity and trusting God. Western
Christianity, both Catholic
and Protestant, share
a two thousand year history in
liberating humanity from the oppression of poverty which remains a work in
progress. Churches try to make a
dent in the problem by participating in social services programs to feed hungry
people and house homeless people. Some even provide cash assistance. This is something churches are expected to do,
and with the rise of conservatism in this country that has resulted in cutbacks
to social programs to take care of the least among us, those are important
ministries. Saint Cecilia’s will, from time to time, assist with those
ministries, with both personnel and economic resources. But I wonder, however, whether by doing those
things, are we simply putting a Band-Aid on a cancerous sore instead of
aggressively addressing the cancer with surgery to get rid of it? Should we not be talking about the cultural
values that cause poverty?
Today’s readings give
us a glimpse into the spirituality of poverty. People without much money
sometimes more intensely realize the need for Jesus in one’s life and what a
commitment to Jesus requires. The widows,
in both the first reading and the Gospel, give up everything, totally trusting
in God to take care of them, instead of holding on to meager material goods. By
contrast, the wealthier one becomes, the more one tends to trust money rather
than God to provide for one’s needs.
The widows in these stories are poor, but the
stories do not tell us why they were poor. To
understand the significance
of their poverty,
one must understand
widowhood in biblical times. Widows then are not what widows
are today. Women, way back then, were
essentially, property, not persons.
A young woman
belonged to her father
until she married,
at which time
she belonged to
her husband. A woman
with the misfortune
of a husband
dying prematurely faced
an uncertain and
precarious future; inheritance
laws favored a
husband’s male children
and did not
protect widows; thus, widows depended
on the charity
of others for survival. Some, as here, probably hung out at the Temple
to be in a position to receive help. The early church was aware of, and
expressed, its concern for
widows in the Book of Acts, where
the Gentile Christians
complained that their
widows were neglected
in charitable distributions; the
solution was to ordain
Deacons to help. The point is, widows were likely poor due to no fault of their
own, and
due to their position in
society, they were unable
to substantially improve
their economic position unless
they remarried, a
prospect that became
increasingly unlikely as they
grew older.
The widow of Zarepath was left with a bit of
flour and a few drops of oil to make a loaf of bread for her and her son to
eat, after which she expected to die. Elijah asks her to give him the bread
that she was about to put in the oven to bake. The woman agrees. She does not
think about her fate; she only thinks about obeying God’s voice who speaks to
her through the prophet Elijah. She trusted God to take care of everything.
The same theme of trust can be found in the
Gospel reading. The two copper coins which the widow put into the temple
treasury were far more significant to her than the gifts from the rich people. She gave away money that she needed to
survive, whereas the rich people gave from their surplus, money left over after
living expenses were paid. After giving up a significant portion of the money
she needed to survive, she trusted God to provide for her needs.
To put this in practical terms, consider two
people who go to Mass, and who each gives twenty dollars a week. One is a
caregiver. He earns the current minimum wage of nine dollars and hour which
comes out to three hundred and sixty dollars a week for full time work. That
caregiver needs every cent of what he earns to pay for food, rent, and other
survival needs. The other is a software engineer. She earns seventy five
dollars and hour or three thousand dollars a week. She lives well, but still
has money left over after paying all her bills. Therefore, the caregiver gave
more of himself to the church than the software engineer, even though in terms
of dollars, they both gave the same amount of money. Recent studies in
the United States reveal that, relative to their resources, lower income people
are the most generous in giving to church and charity. In this story, Jesus makes clear that “this
poor widow contributed more than all the others who donated to the treasury.” She
risked starvation for acting rightly, while the rich donors risked only
inconvenience.
America
is a capitalist society, which openly favors wealthy people. They reside in
better houses, drive better cars, and live longer. Money makes a difference as
to the length and quality of one’s life. However, the bad news for wealthy
people is that God stands with the least among us, not with the
established economic interests. The Bible is full of stories showing how God Lord
secures justice for the oppressed, gives food to the hungry, sets captives
free, gives sight to the blind, raises up those that were bowed down, protects
strangers, and sustains orphans and widows. If you want to see what I mean
here, read your Bible, particularly, the prophets Amos, Isaiah, and Zechariah,
and the Gospel of Luke, to name just a few.
While many preachers use the
widow-at-the-temple story to encourage people to give more money to the
church, that’s not
the entire message. What the widow did in this story speaks
volumes about where her heart is.
She put her all into
the treasury just as
Jesus emptied all of his godliness into becoming
human. For the widow,
as for Jesus, her giving of
herself was a sacrifice, in the same way the widow in the first reading gave
all that she had to provide feed her son and her visitor, the prophet
Elijah. She trusted that God would provide for all three of them, even after
she had given up all the food she had. This is the attitude Jesus wants from
His followers, the exact of opposite of the scribes mentioned in the first part
of today’s Gospel reading.
We must ask ourselves: are we prepared, as
Christians, to empty and
present ourselves, our
souls and bodies,
to be a
holy and living sacrifice
to God? I’m not convinced some modern Christians
are. Many people in this day and age,
who consider themselves committed
Christians, sometimes skip
Mass to attend
family outings, athletic events,
and entertainment venues.
I think we can agree that their priorities are a stark contrast to those
of the widow in this story. The commitment to God of some of today’s Christians
is more like the rich people in
the story who
gave out of
their surplus instead
of their substance. Put
another way, people who don’t
have to work on Sunday come to Sunday Mass when
nothing else on Sunday
in their secular world seems more
important.
But this behavior is not entirely their
fault. Most of the blame lies with us clergy. We clergy must ask ourselves what it
is about the
Sunday experience we offer that allows people to
believe competing secular
activities can be
more important than Mass. Our challenge is to make experience
of attending Mass so satisfying that it becomes a high priority activity.
Please know that I will always be open to listening to what you have to say
about what we do here, about what we need to improve or change.
What I do know, however, is that we certainly
aren’t going to attract people to church by acting like the scribes in the first
part of the Gospel lesson. These guys were a bunch of narcissistic spoiled
brats. Only a narcissist, that is a person with sense of entitlement arising
out of an unrealistic idea of that person’s own self-importance, would insist
on walking around in flowing robes demanding obeisance and the best seats both
in the temple and at banquets. We all
know people who feel entitled to the best of everything based on who they think
they are. Jesus found them obnoxious, just like as we do. And even more egregious,
they apparently cheated widows out of their property, much like the fraudsters
portrayed on the CNBC program, “American Greed.”
Not only were these scribes lacking in
humility and overflowing with greed, they were practitioners of oppression. Jesus
criticized them for laying too many burdens on people’s shoulders. For hundreds
of years, not just Catholicism, but many other religions, have imposed
burdensome rules on people. Having a
bunch of silly rules is exactly the kind of legalistic approach to religion
that Jesus condemned. Throughout the Gospels, Jesus criticized the Jewish
purity codes and dietary regulations as inviting hypocrisy. The Sadducees,
scribes, Pharisees, and others like them, believed if they obeyed the rules and
did all the right prayer rituals, they’d escape punishment from God, in this
life and the next. That’s what they used
to justify imposing rules on people. They wanted to make people scared of God.
The problem with this mindset, however, is that it shifted the spiritual
emphasis towards rules and away from worshipping the majesty of God’s creation
and the experience of God’s love.
Religious rules give the religious elite
security. It enables them to control and dominate others for their own benefit,
setting themselves as self-appointed gatekeepers to God. Unfortunately, the
same mindset Jesus observed in the Judaism of his day carried over into
Christianity. Imposing rules on people is the kind of thing that makes people
stop going to church. Perhaps a church that feels hardship should look inward
at itself and ask if it is doing what the Pharisees are accused of doing in
today’s Gospel reading. They are obviously not the sacrificial givers who will
further the Kingdom of God. Jesus neither needs nor wants a gatekeeper. Jesus wants followers like this widow, who,
without significant resources, gave to the temple a significant portion of her
scarce wealth.
Today’s readings remind us that the
generosity of the two widows emanates from the generosity of God, who is
generous to us out of love. The widow of Zarephath is saved from starvation because
of her generosity to the prophet Elijah. When we live as a disciple of
Jesus, like the widow with two coins, we come to the temple of God, God’s
kingdom on earth, open to engage our whole being, our whole livelihood, lived
with priorities of service, simplicity and surrender from our self-serving
lifestyle. When we do that, we experience the generosity of God, manifested to
us in Jesus, who wants commitment of all that is within us, given out of love. AMEN.
Comments